← Markets

Who will Trump publicly insult by September 30?

Trump Vol. $128,933 50 traders

Nicolás Maduro99%
Barack Obama100%
Abdul El-Sayed100%
Kaitlan Collins100%
$128,933 Vol. Trump

Outcomes

40
Chance
Tucker Carlson
56% ▼ 11
Megyn Kelly
34% ▼ 8
Candace Owens
28% ▲ 11
Alex Jones
46% ▲ 35
Pope Leo XIV
3% ▼ 3
Vladimir Putin
1% ▼ 2
Joe Biden Resolved
90%
Barack Obama Resolved
90% ▲ 6
Marjorie Taylor Greene
34% ▼ 10
Pam Bondi
1% ▼ 9
Benjamin Netanyahu
10% ▼ 31
J.D. Vance
5% ▼ 10
Melania Trump
23% ▼ 25
Xi Jinping
6%
Andy Burnham
20% ▼ 22
Elon Musk
33% ▼ 9
Jerome Powell
26% ▼ 21
Nicolás Maduro Resolved
90%
Zohran Mamdani
22% ▼ 8
Jimmy Kimmel
31% ▼ 25
Emmanuel Macron
20% ▼ 1
Friedrich Merz
23% ▼ 8
Norah O'Donnell
18% ▼ 32
Kaitlan Collins Resolved
90% ▲ 39
Mohammed bin Salman
1% ▼ 4
Kevin Warsh
8% ▼ 22
Karoline Leavitt
1% ▼ 2
James Talarico Resolved
90%
Stephen Colbert
25%
Abdul El-Sayed Resolved
90% ▲ 14
Kathy Hochul
46% ▼ 26
Ilhan Omar
32% ▼ 25
Letitia James
42% ▼ 6
J.B. Pritzker Resolved
90% ▲ 1
Jon Ossoff
34% ▼ 22
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
41% ▼ 10
Mark Carney
73% ▼ 6
Hillary Clinton
39% ▼ 15
Elizabeth Warren
28% ▼ 20
Adam Schiff
42% ▼ 5

Recent trades

  • No recent trades

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.

Comments